GETTING MY CASE LAWS 506 B PPC PRE ARREST BAIL TO WORK

Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Blog Article

Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

101 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it truly is easy for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to get rid of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's achieved into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got reached these kinds of stage. Read more

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not utilize, given that the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has been acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it's well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.

Within the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments play a vital role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. A single this kind of notable amendment that has garnered attention would be the latest revision of Section 489-File with the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

It's now nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different, therefore, within our view the learned Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner via the same Additional Sessions Judge.”

The case addresses a range of issues which include, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation in the right to life.

The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[4]

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.

P.C. Liability of petitioners to the explained offences would be determined via the discovered trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value with the material produced before the same. Till then, case of

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been in the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we have been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy issue to the approval of the competent authority.

The scrupulous reader may have noticed some thing earlier mentioned: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses about the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two fundamental elements that must be proven in order check here to convict a person of the crime are “

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It's nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are established by executive organizations based on statutes.

Report this page